Cases 1 - 10 of 53
John Darouse, Jr. v. Herbert Gill
as 23-1602
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN P. DAROUSE, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
HERBERT C. GILL, JR., Judge, individual and official capacity, A. CONRAD BAREFORD, III, CHARLES R. CARRITHERS and others
Wells v. State of Illinois et al
as 3:2022cv02379
Plaintiff:
William E Wells
Defendant:
State of Illinois, Judge Carey C. Gill and Judge John W Sanders
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Marvin Gill v. Secretary, Department of Corrections, et al
as 22-12743
Petitioner / Appellant:
MARVIN C. GILL
Respondent / Appellee:
SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00017
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
USA v. Gill
as 4:2021cv01235
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
Lillie C Gill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Debt to United States
Darouse v. Gill et al
as 4:2021cv00094
Plaintiff:
Paul Darouse, Jr. and John Paul Darouse, Jr.
Defendant:
Herbert C. Gill, A. Conrad Bareford, III, Charles R. Carrithers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kimberly Lowe v. Judge Herbert Gill
as 20-2198
Defendant:
JUDGE WILLIAM ALLEN SHARRETT, J. RYAN FERRY, AMANDA JONES and others
Defendant / Appellee:
JUDGE HERBERT C. GILL, JR., Judge
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KIMBERLY LOWE
GILL v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2020cv02446
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW C. GILL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GILLS v. FLORIDA ATTORNEY GENERAL et al
as 3:2020cv05838
Defendant:
FLORIDA ATTORNEY GENERAL, FLORIDA DIVISION OF RISK MANAGEMENT and CARYL KILINSKI
Plaintiff:
MARVIN C GILLS and MARVIN C GILL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James Simpson v. Martesha Bishop
as 19-7092
Defendant / Appellee:
THOMAS B. HOOVER, Judge, MORTRSH DISHA, Magistrate, MICHAEL POERSTEL, Officer and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES SIMPSON
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
