Cases
Cases 21 - 28 of 28
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv01637
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
James Biggins v. C. Danberg, et al
as 10-2939
Plaintiff - Appellant: JAMES ARTHUR BIGGINS
Defendant - Appellee: C. DANBERG, RICK KEARNEY, MIKE COSTELLO and others
Debtor - Appellee: M. LITTLE
Biggins v. Danberg et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2009cv00862
Plaintiff: James Arthur Biggins
Defendant: C. Danberg, T. Carroll, R. Kearney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kemp v. Harper et al
as 1:2009cv02044
Plaintiff: Johnny C. Kemp, Jr.
Defendant: M. O. Harper, Douglas County Jail, Phil D. Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KEMP v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, INC. et al
as 2:2009cv74033
Plaintiff: CARLOS C KEMP
Defendant: FORD MOTOR COMPANY, INC., FORD MOTOR COMPANY, INC., FORD MOTOR COMPANY, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Type: Torts - Injury None
Pharmacy Holding Company, Inc., et al. v. Medicine Shoppe International, Inc., et al.
as 4:2008cv00042
Plaintiff: Pharmacy Holding Company, Inc., Pharmacy Holding Company, Inc., Pharmacy Holding Company, Inc. and others
Defendant: Medicine Shoppe International Inc., Cardinal Health, Inc. and American Arbitration Association
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Siano v. County of Sacramento, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2007cv01659
Defendant: County of Sacramento, County of Sacramento Department of Parks and Recreation, C. Kemp and others
Plaintiff: Janet Lorraine Siano
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
v. County of Sacramento et al
as 2:2007at00749
Defendant: County of Sacramento, County of Sacramento Department of Parks and Recreation, C Kemp and others
Plaintiff: Janet Lorraine Siano
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?