Cases 1 - 10 of 100
CLIFF et al v. ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
as 1:2026cv02620
Plaintiff:
STACY CLIFF, CHRISTOPHER SUTER, DIXIE SUTER and others
Defendant:
ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act
Morrow v. Acevedo et al
as 3:2026cv04250
Plaintiff:
Robert L. Morrow
Defendant:
Rafael Acevedo, R. Noriega, E. Vega and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Westervelt v. Morrow et al
as 1:2026cv02033
Plaintiff:
Suzanne R. Westervelt and Richard R. Morrow, Jr.
Defendant:
Nikolai Petrov, GN Transport, Robert Wendeln and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2026cv01580
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2026cv01939
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Morrow v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2026cv02551
Plaintiff:
Michelle Rose Morrow
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 427 Social Security Benefits
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv00591
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination
Morrow v. Bisignano
as 5:2026cv00488
Plaintiff:
Avery Morrow
Defendant:
Frank Bisignano
Interested Party:
SSA-Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
United States of America v. Morrow?Wu
as 26-1881
Defendant:
SHANGZHEN WU, MATTHEW MORROWWU, Daniel Wu and others
Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Morrow v. Whitworth et al
as 5:2026cv00257
Plaintiff:
Sandy Morrow
Defendant:
Chris Whitworth, Daniel Napier, Chris Elleman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
