Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Harris v. Janson et al
as 2:2023cv06916
Plaintiff:
Patrick O'neal Harris
Defendant:
Warden S. Janson, Officer P. Davis, R&D Officer Howard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Noel v. Hawaiian Telecom et al
as 1:2022cv11423
Plaintiff:
Arnold A Noel
Defendant:
Hawaiian Telecom, Eric K Yeaman, Steven Golden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Rodrigues v. Colvin
as 1:2015cv00294
Plaintiff:
Paula C Rodrigues
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Creme De La Creme, Inc. v. Creme De La Creme of Seaford, LLC et al
as 2:2012cv02986
Defendant:
Creme De La Creme of Merrick, LLC, Creme De La Creme of Seaford, LLC, Dawn Maola and others
Plaintiff:
Creme De La Creme, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
RODRIGUE et al v. A. C. & S., INC. et al
as 2:2011cv60623
Plaintiff:
LOVONIA C. RODRIGUE and ADDIE A. RODRIGUE
Defendant:
A. C. & S., INC., CELOTEX CORPORATION , FIBREBOARD CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv02892
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
In re: Maricris Rodrigues-Lababit, et al
as 10-60019
Debtor:
In re: MARICRIS C. RODRIGUES-LABABIT and MICHAEL J. LABABIT
Appellant:
ROBERT ZAUPER
Appellee:
MARICRIS C. RODRIGUES-LABABIT and MICHAEL J. LABABIT
Gonzalez v. Adams et al
as 1:2009cv01284
Petitioner:
Everett Galindo Gonzalez
Defendant:
Derral G. Adams, C. Gardemal, L. Watson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rodrigues v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2009at00089
Plaintiff:
Juan C. Rodrigues
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Rodrigues v. CSS
as 2:2009cv00162
Plaintiff:
Juan C. Rodrigues
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
