Cases 61 - 70 of 77
JONES v. U.S. RUBBER COMPANY (UNIROYAL)
as 2:2009cv90093
Plaintiff:
CALVIN JONES and CALVIN JONES
Defendant:
U.S. RUBBER COMPANY (UNIROYAL)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
US v. Calvin Jones
as 09-7109
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
CALVIN JONES
Dillard, et al v. Chilton Co. Comm., et al
as 2:1987cv01179
Plaintiff:
John Dillard , Damascus Crittenden, Jr. , Earwen Ferrell and others
Defendant:
Chilton County Commission and Robert B. Martin
Intervenor_plaintiff:
Robert R. Binion , John Wright , Gilbert Green and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1973 Voting Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2008cv00394
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Emanuel v. Medlock, et al
as 08-20021
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LORENZO DONNELL EMANUEL
Defendant - Appellee:
PATRICK MEDLOCK, RANDALL COOK, ANGELA HAWTHORN and others
Jones v. Watkins et al
as 1:2007cv00212
Plaintiff:
Kattasser Calvin Jones
Defendant:
Michael Watkins, Mark Moore, M. Moe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv00195
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Johnson v. Hampton County Detention Center et al
as 6:2007cv02792
Plaintiff:
Timothy R Johnson
Defendant:
Hampton County Detention Center, Kelvin Ruth, LaShonda Marshall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Jones v. King et al
as 4:2007cv02429
Plaintiff:
Calvin Jones
Defendant:
Deidre M. King, Stephanie Hidrogo, Joann McCoy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Ortiz et al
as 4:2007cv01877
Plaintiff:
Calvin Jones
Defendant:
Madeline M Ortiz, Mark Jones, Angela N Warner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
