Cases 51 - 60 of 60
Lawrence v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2010cv01579
Plaintiff:
Ezra Lawrence
Defendant:
The City of New York, The New York Police Department, Carlos Medina and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2009cv02160
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
USA v. Carlos Medina-Pruneda
as 09-40279
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
CARLOS MEDINA-PRUNEDA
United States v. Medina-Corrales
as 08-3241
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JUAN CARLOS MEDINA-CORRALES
Deanda v. 2 Pesos Mexican Cafe, Inc. et al
as 2:2008cv01362
Plaintiff:
Ricardo Deanda
Defendant:
2 Pesos Mexican Cafe, Inc. and Carlos Medina
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Caballero et al v. Carlos Medina Enterprises, Inc. et al
as 2:2008cv00996
Plaintiff:
Ricardo Caballero and Yuridia Cruz-Luna
Defendant:
Carlos Medina Enterprises, Inc., Guadalajara Grill Enterprises, Inc., Ann Moses and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Cellitti v. Mexico Lindo, Inc. et al
as 2:2008cv00923
Plaintiff:
Ronald Cellitti
Defendant:
Mexico Lindo, Inc., Fernando Medina, Robert Medina and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Medina v. M.S.C.O et al
as 2:2007cv02373
Plaintiff:
Carlos Medina
Defendant:
M.S.C.O and Joe Arpaio
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stefan v. Pinzon et al
as 3:2007cv00178
Plaintiff:
Edward M Stefan
Defendant:
Carlos Medina Pinzon and Does 1 through 10
Cause Of Action: Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:1978cv00175
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Pecial_master:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Movant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Intervenor_plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
