Cases 11 - 20 of 7,726
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01370
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
GHOLSTON v. CARTER et al
as 1:2024cv00791
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM GHOLSTON
Defendant:
JASON CARTER, JAEKAR TEAH and CENTURION HEALTH SORCES, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2024cv80585
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Thomas Carter v. Michael Burgess
as 24-1396
Petitioner:
THOMAS TYRONE CARTER
Respondent:
MICHAEL BURGESS, Warden
Carter v. Huhn
as 4:2024cv00630
Petitioner:
William Billy G. Carter
Respondent:
Valerie Huhn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Carter v. Troxler
as 1:2024mc00229
Plaintiff:
Jermaine Layton Carter
Defendant:
Bureau Chief Shane Troxler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
AZAR EL v. CABARRUS COUNTY et al
as 1:2024cv00362
Petitioner:
RASHAUD HUSSEIN AZAR EL doing business as JERIMY LOVE
Respondent:
CABARRUS COUNTY, CABARRUS COUNTY JAIL, MIKE DOWNS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
PERDUE v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2024cv00165
Plaintiff:
JEFFERY K. PERDUE
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ROBERT E. CARTER, JR., DENNIS REAGLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
John Wright v. Granville County
as 24-1389
Plaintiff:
JOHN H. WRIGHT, Administrator of the Estate of Chad E. Price
Defendant:
GRANVILLE COUNTY, SHERIFF BRINDELL B. WILKINS, JR., CHARLES ROYSTER NOBLIN, JR. and others
Kolak v. Backerville, et al
as 24-1182
Plaintiff:
WALTER M.J. KOLAK
Defendant:
DENISE BACKERVILLE, MR. CARTER, ARAPHAHOE SHERIFF, ARAPAHOE COUNTY and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
