Cases 1 - 10 of 81
Butler v. Eddy et al.
as 3:2024cv00461
Plaintiff:
Benjanell Butler, Jr.
Defendant:
Dr. Andrew Eddy, David Caudill and Landon Kohls
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv03371
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 American with Disabilities Act
Grace Wilson Marshall v. Benjamin Caudill, et al
as 23-5938
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GRACE L. WILSON MARSHALL
Defendant / Appellee:
BENJAMIN RYAN CAUDILL, VALERIE SCHROEDER KERSHAW, JENNIFER HALL CAUDILL and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00252
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00489
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Wilson Marshall v. Caudill
as 5:2023cv00239
Plaintiff:
Grace L. Wilson Marshall
Defendant:
Benjamin Ryan Caudill, Valerie Kershaw, Jennifer Hall(Caudill) and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv01726
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Harris et al v. AP 11 North LLC et al
as 3:2023cv00288
Plaintiff:
Charles Harris and Justice Smith
Defendant:
AP 11 North LLC, Lauren Ann Caudill, Solodar and Solodar and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
James Eakes v. John Caudill
as 23-5255
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES EAKES
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN L. CAUDILL, Esq, In his Inidividual and his professional capacity
Wilson Marshall v. Caudill
as 1:2023cv01998
Plaintiff:
Grace L. Wilson Marshall
Defendant:
Benjamin Ryan Caudill, Valerie Kershaw, Jennifer Hall(Caudill) and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
