Cases 21 - 30 of 52
WILLIAMS v. SAUL
as 1:2019cv02436
Defendant:
COMM'R ANDREW M. SAUL and ANDREW M. SAUL
Plaintiff:
CHARLES E. WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
United States v. Charles Williams
as 19-1257
Defendant / Appellant:
Charles E. Williams
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Beiersdorfer et al v. LaRose et al
as 4:2019cv00260
Defendant:
Member Paula J Wood, Sharon A Ray, Member Richard F Schoen and others
Plaintiff:
Katharine Jones, Sally Jo Wiley, William Lyons and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bellant et al v. SNYDER et al
as 2:2017cv13887
Plaintiff:
Russ Bellant , Tawanna Simpson , Lamar Lemmons and others
Defendant:
RICHARD D. SNYDER, Andrew Dillon, R. Kevin Clinton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Janssen Research & Development LLC et al
as 2:2017cv06791
Plaintiff:
Charles E Williams
Defendant:
Janssen Research & Development LLC, Johnson & Johnson, Janssen Ortho LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
James Matthews, et al v. Chas, Kurz & Co., Inc., et al
as 16-4146
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES MATTHEWS, RICHARD ADAMS, LAWENCE G. FAGAN and others
Defendant - Appellee:
CHAS, KURZ & CO., INC., MATHIASEN'S TANKER INDUSTRIES, INC., MARINE NAVIGATION COMPANY, INC. and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2016cv01593
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Catherine Phillips, et al v. Richard Snyder, et al
as 15-2394
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CATHERINE PHILLIPS, JOSEPH VALENTI, MICHIGAN AFSCME COUNCIL 25 and others
Defendant - Appellee:
RICHARD D SNYDER and ANDREW DILLON
WILLIAMS v. WRIGHT
as 1:2015cv00134
Plaintiff:
CHARLES E WILLIAMS
Defendant:
DORIS MARIE WRIGHT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Greene et al
as 5:2014mc00932
Petitioner:
Margaret J. Greene and Charles E. Williams
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
