Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Daggs v. Oklahoma Department of Public Safety et al
as 5:2022cv00905
Plaintiff:
Jade Daggs
Defendant:
Oklahoma Department of Public Safety, Charles Kerr, Ronnie Hampton and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 754 Discrimination
Andre Leffebre v. Merrick Garland
as 21-7096
Petitioner / Appellant:
ANDRE DAVID LEFFEBRE, a/k/a Charles Kerr
Respondent / Appellee:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, US Attorney General and MICHAEL CARVAJAL
Leffebre v. Garland et al
as 5:2021cv00057
Petitioner:
Andre David Leffebre and Charles Kerr
Respondent:
US Attorney General Merit Garland and FBOP Director M. D. Carvajal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Kerr v. Cook et al
as 3:2021cv00093
Defendant:
Cook, Fury, Osborn Medical Staff and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Kerr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WHITEST et al v. CRISP COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION et al
as 1:2017cv00109
Defendant:
CRISP COUNTY GEORGIA BOARD OF EDUCATION, BECKY PERKINS, BILL WILSON and others
Plaintiff:
MATHEW WHITEST , SARAH WILLIAMSON , KENYA WILLIAMSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kerr v. Sea World Parks, LLC
as 4:2010cv00090
Plaintiff:
Charles Kerr
Defendant:
Sea World Parks, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Christopher Kerr v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 10-60528
Petitioner:
CHRISTOPHER CHARLES KERR
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Pomes et al v. Markel American Insurance Company et al
as 2:2008cv04435
Plaintiff:
Fay Pomes, Fay Pomes, Fay Pomes and others
Defendant:
Markel American Insurance Company, Pacer International, Inc. and Charles Kerr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Kerr v. Holder
as 08-60020
Petitioner:
CHRISTOPHER CHARLES KERR
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Kerr v. Halliburton Energy Services Inc
as 5:2007cv00359
Plaintiff:
Charles Kerr, Charles Kerr, Charles Kerr and others
Defendant:
Halliburton Energy Services Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Non-Motor Vehicle
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
