Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv05169
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1105 (a) Aliens: Habeas Corpus to Release INS Detainee
Thorndike et al v. VDS Holding LLC et al
as 1:2026cv07883
Plaintiff:
Colleen Thorndike, Kamran Kalantari, Vorada Vorasakdanont and others
Defendant:
VDS Holding LLC and Christopher LeClair
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Afari v. Piper et al
as 6:2026cv06689
Plaintiff:
Mustafa Afari
Defendant:
Christopher Piper, Aaron Boudrez, Todd Baxter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Martin v. 21st Mortgage Corporation
as 3:2026cv02232
Plaintiff:
Christopher L. Martin
Defendant:
21st Mortgage Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Torres Aquino v. Lyons et al
as 1:2026at02698
Petitioner:
Hugo Edgardo Torres Aquino
Respondent:
Todd M. Lyons, Christopher Chestnut, Markwayne Mullin and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv02351
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1105 (a) Aliens: Habeas Corpus to Release INS Det
CENTRAK, INC. v. DORAN et al
as 2:2026cv04671
Plaintiff:
CENTRAK, INC.
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER DORAN and RTLX, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Cook v. Blanche et al
as 1:2026cv01869
Plaintiff:
Christopher Russell Cook
Defendant:
Todd Blanche, Daniel Driscoll, Kash Patel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv01185
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv03870
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
