Cases 1 - 10 of 2,489
Hill v. Medical Staff from Program 1 et al
as 4:2024cv02579
Plaintiff:
Cymeyon V. Hill
Defendant:
Medical Staff from Program 1, Monique and Jenny Clay
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mills v. Clay County Courts et al
as 3:2024cv00420
Plaintiff:
Wallace Mills
Defendant:
Clay County Courts and Clay County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mills, Wallace v. Clay County Courts et al
as 1:2024cv21635
Plaintiff:
Wallace Mills
Defendant:
Clay County Courts and Clay County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Shelley v. Warden
as 5:2024cv00063
Petitioner:
Michael Clay Shelley
Respondent:
FCI Texarkana Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Orr v. Department of Justice et al
as 4:2024cv01981
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Clay Orr
Defendant:
Department of Justice, Richland County Sheriff's Office and SC Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
CRAFT v. SWEARINGEN et al
as 2:2024cv00123
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER CRAFT
Defendant:
BRYSON SWEARINGEN, BRADEN CROWLEY, STAN ROARK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bell v. Clay et al
as 1:2024cv00604
Plaintiff:
Alphonso Bell
Defendant:
Clay and Hodges
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clay v. Western Reception Diagnostic and Correctional Center
as 5:2024cv06051
Plaintiff:
DaRon Clay
Defendant:
Western Reception Diagnostic and Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Coffelt v. White et al
as 7:2024cv00230
Plaintiff:
Joshua Clay Coffelt
Defendant:
Rick White, Holmes and Principle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dustin v. Palmer et al
as 3:2024cv00316
Plaintiff:
Danny Richard Dustin
Defendant:
Charity Palmer, Ashley Terry, Melissa Nelson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
