Cases 41 - 50 of 8,489
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv08051
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Rawlins v. Estes et al
as 2:2024cv00329
Plaintiff:
Robert Clay Rawlins
Defendant:
David Crowder Estes and Jennings Farm Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00485
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Crawford v. Ladnier et al
as 2:2024cv00167
Plaintiff:
Martin Crawford
Defendant:
Darrell Ladnier, Shelton Hamilton, Walter Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Gerstle v. Kentucky Office of Unemployment Insurance et al
as 3:2024cv00176
Plaintiff:
Zoe Gerstle
Defendant:
Kentucky Office of Unemployment Insurance, Sherrell Clay and Commonwealth of Kentucky
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 bv Bivens Non-Prisoner
AMERICAN ART CLAY COMPANY, INC. v. CINCINNATI INSURANCE COMPANY, INC.
as 1:2024cv00462
Plaintiff:
AMERICAN ART CLAY COMPANY, INC.
Defendant:
CINCINNATI INSURANCE COMPANY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
AMERICAN ART CLAY COMPANY, INC. v. THE CINCINNATI INSURANCE COMPANY, INC.
as 1:2024cv00465
Plaintiff:
AMERICAN ART CLAY COMPANY, INC.
Defendant:
THE CINCINNATI INSURANCE COMPANY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
MATACCHIERO v. ADKINSON et al
as 3:2024cv00105
Plaintiff:
DAN MATACCHIERO
Defendant:
CLAY ADKINSON and WILLIAM MCCORMICK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Durand v. State of Nevada, et al.
as 24-1406
Plaintiff:
ROBERTO DURAND
Defendant:
STATE OF NEVADA, ELY STATE PRISON, DR EXUM and others
Jenkins v. Springhill Police Dept et al
as 5:2024cv00357
Plaintiff:
Timmy Clay Jenkins
Defendant:
Springhill Police Dept, Will Lynd, Rodney Hile and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
