Cases 1 - 10 of 8,477
Boyatt v. Clay to Custom Construction, LLC et al
as 2:2024cv00074
Plaintiff:
Anthony Boyatt doing business as Boyatt Design
Defendant:
Clay to Custom Construction, LLC, Arnold Clay Sindledecker and Cody Devin Nutt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Copyright Infringement
Orr v. Department of Justice et al
as 4:2024cv01981
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Clay Orr
Defendant:
Department of Justice, Richland County Sheriff's Office and SC Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Goad v. Lyde
as 24-10333
Plaintiff:
Landon Paul Goad and Sarah Lynn Johnson
Defendant:
Jeff Lyde, Clay County, Texas and John Does, 1-10
Borne v. Home Bank, N.A. et al
as 3:2024cv00303
Plaintiff:
Jason Borne
Defendant:
Home Bank, N.A., Stephen Damore, Newman, Mathis, Brady & Spedale, PLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
LEATHERS et al v. RUSSO et al
as 2:2024cv00554
Plaintiff:
Gregory Clay Leathers and Robert Jeffrey Rhodes
Defendant:
DAVID RUSSO, ZACHARY SAMS, Greene County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CRAFT v. SWEARINGEN et al
as 2:2024cv00123
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER CRAFT
Defendant:
BRYSON SWEARINGEN, BRADEN CROWLEY, STAN ROARK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jemison v. McMillen et al
as 1:2024cv00197
Plaintiff:
Dennis Elijah Jemison
Defendant:
Rodney McMillen, Kroger Company and Clay Richards
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Karrick v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv01072
Plaintiff:
James Clay Karrick
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSAOGC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
HUMANITARIAN v. LEARY et al
as 7:2024cv00032
Plaintiff:
HUMANITARIAN and Larry L. Thomas Jr
Defendant:
PETER D LEARY, STEPHEN LYNN, PETER KO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
