Cases 1 - 10 of 1,109
Leggett v. Wayne County et al
as 2:2024cv00067
Plaintiff:
Cooper Leggett
Defendant:
Wayne County, Wayne County Board of Supervisors, Hal Hayes and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Goad v. Lyde
as 24-10333
Plaintiff:
Landon Paul Goad and Sarah Lynn Johnson
Defendant:
Jeff Lyde, Clay County, Texas and John Does, 1-10
LEATHERS et al v. RUSSO et al
as 2:2024cv00554
Plaintiff:
Gregory Clay Leathers and Robert Jeffrey Rhodes
Defendant:
DAVID RUSSO, ZACHARY SAMS, Greene County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Borne v. Home Bank, N.A. et al
as 3:2024cv00303
Plaintiff:
Jason Borne
Defendant:
Home Bank, N.A., Stephen Damore, Newman, Mathis, Brady & Spedale, PLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jemison v. McMillen et al
as 1:2024cv00197
Plaintiff:
Dennis Elijah Jemison
Defendant:
Rodney McMillen, Kroger Company and Clay Richards
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
HUMANITARIAN v. LEARY et al
as 7:2024cv00032
Plaintiff:
HUMANITARIAN and Larry L. Thomas Jr
Defendant:
PETER D LEARY, STEPHEN LYNN, PETER KO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Harris v. Reeves et al
as 3:2024cv00547
Plaintiff:
Gerard Vondrake Harris
Defendant:
Robert S. Reeves, Cathy S. Palmer, Ralph Todd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv08051
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00485
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Gerstle v. Kentucky Office of Unemployment Insurance et al
as 3:2024cv00176
Plaintiff:
Zoe Gerstle
Defendant:
Kentucky Office of Unemployment Insurance, Sherrell Clay and Commonwealth of Kentucky
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 bv Bivens Non-Prisoner
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
