Cases 31 - 40 of 17,051
Gorbey v. Warden
as 24-2155
Petitioner:
MICHAEL S. GORBEY and Michael Steven Owl Feather-Gorbey
Respondent:
WARDEN, USP Coleman 1
Coleman v. Walgreen Co., doing business as Walgreens
as 2:2024cv00661
Plaintiff:
Marcus Coleman
Defendant:
Walgreen Co., doing business as Walgreens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Strong v. Matthews
as 24-40207
Plaintiff:
DeVon Sean Strong
Defendant:
Hillary R. Matthews, Mohamed L. Touchami, Patrick D. Coleman and others
United States v. Pro Line Management Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00844
Plaintiff:
United States
Defendant:
Pro Life Management Inc. and Jason Coleman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Default of Promissory Note
Coleman, Jr. v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 9:2024cv00065
Petitioner:
Edward James Coleman, Jr.
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Barnhill et al v. Mid-America Pet Food, L.L.C.
as 5:2024cv00046
Plaintiff:
Alison Barnhill, Kimberlee Ferris, Jeffrey Gould and others
Defendant:
Mid-America Pet Food, L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00690
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination
Santana-Cabrera v. Warden, FCC Coleman - Low
as 5:2024cv00155
Petitioner:
Jarol Santana-Cabrera
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman - Low
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Coleman v. Covidien LP et al
as 1:2024cv10832
Plaintiff:
Edward Coleman
Defendant:
Covidien LP and Sofradim Productions SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Coleman v. Superintendent, Mid-State Correctional Facility et al
as 9:2024cv00455
Plaintiff:
Towaun Coleman
Defendant:
Superintendent, Mid-State Correctional Facility and J. Hamilton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
