Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Haller v. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
as 22-3054
Plaintiff / Appellant: Dr. Daniel Haller and Long Island Surgical PLLC
Defendant / Appellee: Xavier Becerra, in his official capacity as Secretary of Health and Human Services, 200 Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20201, United States Office of Personnel Management, United States Department of Health and Human Services, 200 Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20201 and others
Amicus Curiae: American Association of Neurological Surgeons, Congress of Neurological Surgeons, Physicians Advocacy Institute and others
Texas Medical Association et al v. United States Department of Health and Human Services et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2022cv00372
Plaintiff: Texas Medical Association, Tyler Regional Hospital, LLC and Dr. Adam Corley
Defendant: United States Department of Health and Human Services, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY and others
Consolidated Plaintiff: Lifenet, Inc. and East Texas Air One
Consolidated Defendant: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, U.S. Department of the Treasury, U.S. Department of Labor and others
Amicus Curiae: Physicians Advocacy Institute, American Association of Neurological Surgeons, Congress of Neurological Surgeons and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION et al v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES et al
as 1:2021cv03231
Plaintiff: AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, AMERICAN HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION, RENOWN HEALTH and others
Defendant: U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, XAVIER BECERRA, U.S. OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT and others
Petitioner: COLLEGE OF AMERICAN PATHOLOGISTS, PHYSICIANS ADVOCACY INSTITUTE, AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF NEUROLOGICAL SURGEONS and others
Amicus Curiae: FEDERATION OF AMERICAN HOSPITALS, ASSOCIATION OF AMERICAN MEDICAL COLLEGES, AMERICA'S ESSENTIAL HOSPITALS and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Kaul v. Boston Partners Global Investors, Inc., et al
as 21-1686
Plaintiff / Appellant: RICHARD ARJUN KAUL
Defendant / Appellee: BOSTON PARTNERS GLOBAL INVESTORS, INC., STATE STREET CORPORATION, CHRIS CHRISTIE, in his ex-official and individual capacity and others
Defendant: PETER STAATS and JAY HOWARD SOLOMON, in his individual capacity
Richard Kaul, et al v. Federation of State Medical B, et al
as 21-7043
Defendant / Appellee: Geico Indemnity, American Society of Interventional Pain Physicians, Robert Garrett and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: Richard Arjun Kaul, M.D. and Arnold Erwin Feldman, M.D.
Kaul, MD v. Boston Partners, Inc et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv10326
Defendant: North Jersey Media Group Inc, Boston Partners, Inc, Robert Heary,MD and others
Plaintiff: Richard Arjun Kaul, MD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Richard Kaul, et al v. Federation of State Medical B, et al
as 20-7120
Defendant / Appellee: Geico Indemnity, American Society of Interventional Pain Physicians, Robert Garrett and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: Richard Arjun Kaul, M.D. and Arnold Erwin Feldman, M.D.
Richard Kaul v. Lewis Stein, et al
as 20-3522
Defendant / Appellee: UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL, AMERICAN SOCIETY OF INTERVENTIONAL PAIN PHYSICIANS, PETER STAATS, MD and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: RICHARD ARJUN KAUL, MD
KAUL et al v. FEDERATION OF STATE MEDICAL BOARDS et al
as 2:2020cv18853
Plaintiff: Richard Arjun Kaul and ARNOLD ERWIN FELDMAN
Defendant: ALLSTATE NEW JERSEY INSURANCE COMPANY, TD BANK N.A., ATLANTIC HEALTH SYSTEM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KAUL et al v. FEDERATION OF STATE MEDICAL BOARDS et al
as 1:2020cv18853
Defendant: ALLSTATE NEW JERSEY INSURANCE COMPANY, TD BANK N.A., ATLANTIC HEALTH SYSTEM and others
Plaintiff: M.D. Richard Arjun Kaul and ARNOLD ERWIN FELDMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?