Cases 1 - 10 of 92
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv03137
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
Gettings v. Kacalek, et al.
as 26-1411
Plaintiff:
JIMMY GETTINGS
Defendant:
RYAN KACALEK, Shasta County Sheriff's Deputy, COUNTY OF SHASTA, MOLLY ROBERTS, Shasta Animal Control Officer and others
Genao v. City of New York
as 26-392
Plaintiff:
GABINO GENAO
Defendant:
CITY OF NEW YORK, HARVEY, DOC Assistant Deputy Warden, Captain DUNCAN-CHANDLER, EHO Captain (MDC) and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv00112
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1105 (a) Aliens: Habeas Corpus to Release INS Det
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv01698
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1105 (a) Aliens: Habeas Corpus to Release INS Detainee
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv00396
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
David Meyers v. J. Artrip
as 26-6174
Plaintiff:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant:
WARDEN J. ARTRIP, S. CAUGHRON, WRSP Operations Manager, TINA TOWNSEND, WRSP Health Services Administrator and others
Crump (PS) v. Administrative Remedy Coordinator Control Office et al
as 1:2025cv03427
Plaintiff:
Norvell Crump and Norvell Webster Crump
Defendant:
Administrative Remedy Coordinator Control Office, Warden, United States Probation Offices and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Shepard, et al.
as 25-6027
Plaintiff:
ERIC DAVON DAVIS
Defendant:
NEIL SHEPARD, Comissioner, JAYA BADIGA, COUNTY OF EL DORADO, Auditor-Controller's Office and others
Hammond v. Long
as 25-1953
Plaintiff:
TAMMY HAMMOND
Defendant:
Officer KYLE LONG and CARRIE HERB, Animal Control Officer
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
