Cases 41 - 50 of 245
Apel v. Missouri Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2019cv01929
Plaintiff:
Joshua R. Apel
Defendant:
Amy Neale, Pike County Commission, Chris Gamm and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv06019
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 nr
FREDERICK v. MCNEIL et al
as 4:2019cv00162
Defendant:
KIMBERLY PETERSEN, CORIZON HEALTH, INC., WALTER MCNEIL and others
Plaintiff:
ELIZABETH FREDERICK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JOHNSON v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2019cv01942
Plaintiff:
ROBERT JOHNSON
Defendant:
JOHN DOE 16-18, JOHN DOE 1-3, JOHN DOE 10-12 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Helvey v. Lexington-Fayette Urban County Government et al
as 5:2019cv00136
Defendant:
Mary Ann Franco, Steve Haney, Heather Lakes and others
Plaintiff:
Chase Helvey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cardone v. County of Alameda et al
as 3:2019cv00221
Plaintiff:
Dante Lee Cardone
Defendant:
Corizon Health Inc., County of Alameda, Wellpath, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Garrett v. Corizon LLC et al
as 2:2018cv00972
Defendant:
Charles Hooper, Alabama Department of Corrections, Dewayne Estes and others
Plaintiff:
Shelena Garrett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TALBERT v. CORRECTIONAL DENTAL ASSOCIATES et al
as 2:2018cv05112
Defendant:
SIDDHARTH SAGREIYA, SIGY GEORGE, EDWARD BOWMAN and others
Plaintiff:
CHARLES TALBERT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MOORE et al v. CORIZON HEALTH INC. et al
as 1:2017cv00987
Plaintiff:
MOORE, JEREMY EUGENE MOORE, NATASHA ROSE MOORE and others
Defendant:
CORIZON HEALTH INC, KEITH RAY, JENNIE L MAUCK and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv09709
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
