Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Frelix-Walker et al V. John Doe, et al
as 1:2026cv07786
Plaintiff:
Delvonn Frelix-Walker
Defendant:
John Doe, Arthur Willis and CPD
:
Service List
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clervrain v. Office of Personnel Management, et al
as 26-1556
Plaintiff:
MANETIRONY CLERVRAIN, LANESE NORMIL, MICHAELLE DESROSIERS CADET and others
Defendant:
US OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT, OPM, RHODE ISLAND DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, RHODE ISLAND DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE and others
Mayle v. Merritt et al
as 1:2026cv05293
Plaintiff:
Kenneth William Mayle
Defendant:
Kenya Merritt, City of Chicago, Piazza and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bolt v. Hamilton County, Ohio et al
as 1:2026cv00373
Plaintiff:
William Bolt
Defendant:
Hamilton County, Ohio, City of Cincinnati, Ohio, Gwen Bender and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Robinson v. CPD et al
as 1:2026cv03677
Plaintiff:
Shawn Neal Robinson, Jr
Defendant:
CPD and DCFS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Dawkins v. McCabe et al
as 2:2026cv00216
Plaintiff:
Cleveon Dawkins
Defendant:
Wyatt McCabe, John Doe CPD Officer and The City of Charleston
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Landis v. CPD
as 1:2025cv13987
Plaintiff:
Theodore A Landis
Defendant:
CPD, Carl E. Martin and John Doe Officer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Willis v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2025cv13098
Plaintiff:
Renardo Lachon Willis
Defendant:
City of Chicago, CPD, Webb and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Maye v. Kelley et al
as 2:2025cv01241
Plaintiff:
Ricco L Maye
Defendant:
Kevin Kelley, Heather Hill, Brandon Harmon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson Sr. v. CPD et al
as 1:2025cv09089
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Jackson Sr.
Defendant:
CPD and Officer Ontiveros
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
