Cases 21 - 30 of 35
Cravey et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv30704
Plaintiff:
Jeannene Cravey and Robert L. Cravey
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Parten v. PERRY et al
as 1:2014cv00134
Plaintiff:
RONALD PARTEN
Defendant:
EDGAR PERRY, RAYMOND BITTNER, JEANETTE BITTNER and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964
Lewis Key, Jr. v. William Currey, et al
as 14-12235
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LEWIS KEY, JR., a.k.a. Samuel Lewis Key, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee:
WILLIAM CURREY, Parole Officer, GDOC, River Willows Nursing Center, MICHELLE CRAVEY, M.D., River Willows Nursing Center and LINDA ADAMS, Social Worker, River Willows Nursing Center
Cravey v. Biomet Inc et al
as 3:2014cv00784
Defendant:
Biomet Inc, Biomet Orthopedics LLC and Biomet U S Reconstruction LLC
Plaintiff:
Melvin Cravey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CRAVEY v. GAINESVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2014cv00041
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL CRAVEY
Defendant:
GAINESVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT, JAMES EAGAN HOLMES, MONIVETTE CORDEIRO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KEY v. HARRINGTON et al
as 5:2013cv00134
Plaintiff:
LEWIS KEY, JR
Defendant:
GIL HARRINGTON, WHITE, CRAVEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2011cv00135
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Eugene Cravey v. Warden, et al
as 11-12202
Petitioner - Appellant:
EUGENE LAFAYETTE CRAVEY
Respondent - Appellee:
WARDEN and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF ALABAMA
Stephens v. Lieupo et al
as 7:2011cv00033
Plaintiff:
Jason Michael Stephens
Defendant:
Lonnie Lieupo, Kiley Johnson, James Foster and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CRAVEY v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2010cv52016
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM B. CRAVEY
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
