Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv01513
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Roberts v. Graves et al
as 4:2022cv00492
Plaintiff:
Brunson Roberts
Defendant:
Solomon Graves, Dexter Payne, William Straughn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carter v. Kulp
as 3:2020cv01115
Defendant:
Nicholas W. Kulp
Plaintiff:
Calvin Carter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carter v. Watkins et al
as 3:2019cv00965
Defendant:
Deborah Housel and Monte Watkins
Plaintiff:
Calvin Carter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stemple v. Warden of MCI-H et al
as 1:2017cv01782
Plaintiff:
Michael Ray Stemple
Defendant:
Warden of MCI-H and Calvin Carter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harvey et al v. Combe Incorporated et al
as 3:2016cv01381
Plaintiff:
Nolan Harvey , Scott Adams , Cecil Adkins and others
Defendant:
Combe Incorporated , Combe Products, Inc. , Combe Laboratories, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Carter v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice et al
as 6:2016cv00593
Plaintiff:
Calvin Carter
Defendant:
Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Texas Board of Pardons and Parole, Texas Correctional Industries and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carter v. Cook County Illinois et al
as 1:2014cv01115
Plaintiff:
Calvin Carter
Defendant:
Cook County Illinois, Cook County Sheriff Department, Cook County Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv03607
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
United States of America v. Carter et al
as 2:2013cv10742
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Calvin Carter, Laron Stroud and Raheen Stroud
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
