Cases 31 - 40 of 4,371
St. John v. Campbell
as 1:2024cv10646
Petitioner:
Sandra Natasha St. John
Respondent:
Andrea Joy Campbell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Truitt v. Mcdougle et al
as 5:2024cv00277
Plaintiff:
Jessie F Truitt, III
Defendant:
Mike Mcdougle, Susanne Campbell, FNU Madden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Campbell v. Collins
as 3:2024cv00179
Plaintiff:
Lee Marcell Campbell
Defendant:
Director Jerry Collins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Heard v. Stateville NRC et al
as 1:2024cv02217
Plaintiff:
Eric T. Heard
Defendant:
Stateville NRC, Hill, Simon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WALLACE v. UNKNOWN OFFICERS OF THE FLOYD COUNTY JAIL et al
as 4:2024cv00047
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER W. WALLACE
Defendant:
UNKNOWN OFFICERS OF THE FLOYD COUNTY JAIL, BARNES, CAMPBELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walter Reginald Beasley, Jr. v. Tammy L. Campbell
as 5:2024cv00559
Petitioner:
Walter Reginald Beasley, Jr.
Respondent:
Tammy L. Campbell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Campbell v. Beal et al
as 1:2024cv01054
Plaintiff:
Robert Duane Campbell
Defendant:
Steve Beal and Junior Howard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wood v. Clarke et al
as 1:2024cv00404
Plaintiff:
James R. Wood
Defendant:
Harold W. Clarke, Steve Herrick, J.D. Oates and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Campbell v. Mayor of Robbins Illinois et al
as 1:2024cv02097
Plaintiff:
David Campbell
Defendant:
Mayor of Robbins Illinois, Chief of Police and Sharon Dyson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Campbell v. Matterson
as 4:2024cv01464
Petitioner:
Anthony Tyrone Campbell
Respondent:
Giselle Matterson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
