Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Little v. South Carolina Dept of Corr Cooperation et al
as 0:2024cv01177
Plaintiff:
David Antonio Little, Jr.
Defendant:
South Carolina Dept. of Corr. Corporation, Kershaw Corr. Inst., Warden James and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Christopher Patterson v. Captain Karen Henderson
as 23-6501
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER O'NEAL PATTERSON
Defendant / Appellee:
CAPTAIN HENDERSON, DANIEL BARNES, CHRISTOPHER OXENDINE and others
Defendant:
CORRECTIONAL OFFICER FAISON and JOHN DOE
Kitchens v. Lewis et al
as 2:2022cv00162
Plaintiff:
Timothy Kitchens
Defendant:
C/O Lewis, C/O 28, Sheriff Charlie Sims and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miles v. Anthony et al
as 1:2022cv03805
Plaintiff:
Rodney Jerome Miles
Defendant:
C/O Anthony, DW Mims, DW Chambers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown, Sr. v. Davis et al
as 2:2020cv03107
Defendant:
Warden McDuffie, Captain Thompson, Bryan Stirling and others
Plaintiff:
Curtis Jerome Brown, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SCHILLER v. COLLINS et al
as 4:2019cv00195
Defendant:
MARSHAL, COLLINS and CAPTAIN HENDERSON
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY L SCHILLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PATTERSON v. HENDERSON et al
as 1:2019cv00204
Defendant:
OFFICER OXENDINE, C/O WIGS, C/O WINDLEY and others
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER O'NEAL PATTERSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HINKLEDIRE v. PREBISH et al
as 3:2015cv00048
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY S. HINKLEDIRE
Defendant:
JOHN J. PREBISH, CHRISTIAN SMITH, WILLIAM PATTERSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James Smith v. Rachel et al
as 2:2012cv08536
Defendant:
Chief Medical Officer, M Fitz, M Fitz and others
Plaintiff:
James Smith
Melvin Dukes v. Warden Cash et al
as 2:2011cv05112
Respondent:
Warden Cash, Captain Henderson, Lieutenant Meizrcth and others
Petitioner:
Melvin Dukes
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
