Cases 1 - 10 of 33
HARRIS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv07332
Plaintiff:
CARL HARRIS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Harris v. Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC et al
as 3:2023pq02331
Plaintiff:
Carl Harris
Defendant:
Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC, Syngenta AG and Chevron U.S.A., Inc.
Special Master:
Randi Ellis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Harrif v. Boehringer Ingelheim et al
as 9:2022cv81123
Plaintiff:
Carl Harrie and Carl Harrif
Defendant:
BOEHRINGER INGELHEIM PHARMACEUTCALS, INC., GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC;, Inc Pfizer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Alvarez v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company et al
as 2:2022cv00172
Plaintiff:
Leticia Alvarez
Defendant:
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, Carl Harris and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Harris v. The City of Ozark, Alabama et al
as 1:2021cv00553
Plaintiff:
Carl Harris, Jr.
Defendant:
The City of Ozark, Alabama, Marlos Walker, Jimmy Culbreath and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris v. Spire Global, Inc.
as 3:2021cv04500
Defendant:
Spire Global, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Carl Harris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Harris v. Spire Global, Inc.
as 4:2021cv04502
Defendant:
Spire Global, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Carl Harris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HARRIS v 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2021cv00386
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
CARL HARRIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Harris v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2021cv00469
Defendant:
Aearo Holding LLC, Aearo Intermediate LLC, Aearo Technologies LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Carl Harris
Harris v. USA
as 3:2020cv00442
Petitioner:
Carl Harris
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
