Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Doe v. Fitch
as 22-60481
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Arthur Doe, Brenda Doe, Carol Doe and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Lynn Fitch, Sean Tindell, Commissioner of the Mississippi Department of Public Safety, Megan Costilow, Director of the Mississippi Sex Offender Registry and others
Tang et al v. Incare Metal Holdings, Corp et al
as 1:2020cv00935
Defendant:
Incare Metal Holdings, Corp and Tian Xin Situ
Plaintiff:
Zhong Ping Li, Carol Doe and Xi Tang
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206 Collect Unpaid Wages
Panchitkaew v. NY State Attorney General et al
as 2:2019cv07233
Defendant:
Chade Schupler, Judy Blumenberg, Logan Gettings and others
Plaintiff:
Marut Panchitkaew
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Panchitkaew v. NY State Attorney General et al
as 1:2019cv09686
Defendant:
Nassau County, USPS, NY State Attorney General and others
Plaintiff:
Marut Panchitkaew
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robert Barrick v. Barack Obama et al
as 8:2016cv01909
Plaintiff:
Robert Barrick
Defendant:
Kristie Canegallo, Brian Deese, Amy Doe and others
Doe et al v. Hood et al
as 3:2016cv00789
Plaintiff:
Arthur Doe , Brenda Doe , Carol Doe and others
Defendant:
Jim Hood , Albert Santa Cruz , Charlie Hill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv02308
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2012cv04355
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2011cv03594
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Grimes v. South Dakota Board of Regents et al
as 4:2010cv04175
Plaintiff:
Jerome L. Grimes
Defendant:
South Dakota Board of Regents, Erin (DOE), Kari (DOE) and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
