Cases 11 - 20 of 74
JONES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv87976
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
CAROL JONES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Duncan v. Jones Russell
as 2:2020cv00081
Plaintiff:
Alex-Wayne Duncan
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Defendant:
Judge Carol Jones Russell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv05316
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Carol Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JONES v 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2019cv02062
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
CAROL JONES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jones v. Casey et al
as 3:2019cv00480
Defendant:
Jennifer Casey and Essentia Insurance Company
Plaintiff:
Carol Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jones v. 3M Company et al
as 3:2019cv00972
Defendant:
Aearo Holding LLC, Aearo, LLC, 3M Company and others
Plaintiff:
Carol Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jones v. Janssen Research & Development LLC et al
as 2:2019cv03148
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson Company, Bayer HealthCare LLC, JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. f/k/a JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICA INC. f/k/a ORTHO-MCNEIL-JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
Carol Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ramadan v. Richmond Redevelopment And Housing Authority et al
as 3:2019cv00166
Defendant:
Sylvia Cosby Jones, Ms. M. Hicks, Carol Jones Gilbert and others
Plaintiff:
Al-Tariq R. Ramadan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Trelleborg Sealing Solutions US, Inc.
as 1:2018cv03002
Defendant:
Trelleborg Sealing Solutions US, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Carol Jones
Jones-Crawley v. Hospira Worldwide, LLC, et al
as 2:2017cv14294
Plaintiff:
Carol Jones-Crawley
Defendant:
Hospira, Inc. and Hospira Worldwide, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
