Cases 1 - 10 of 33
Andrew Goosby Jr. v. Carl Warren and Company et al
as 2:2019cv09688
Plaintiff:
Andrew Goosby, Jr
Defendant:
Sylvia Hernandez, Carl Warren and Company and Carol Woods
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WOOD v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2018cv03626
Defendant:
COOK MEDICAL LLC, COOK INCORPORATED and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Plaintiff:
CAROL WOOD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Almos et al v. Bayer Corp. et al
as 3:2017cv00628
Plaintiff:
Rebecca Almos , April Baldridge , Janet Barra and others
Defendant:
Bayer Corp. , Bayer Healthcare LLC , Bayer Essure Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Saboury v. Lansing, City of et al
as 1:2016cv00885
Plaintiff:
Sam Saboury
Defendant:
Lansing, City of, Carol Wood, Jody Washington and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 3601
Woods v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv01100
Plaintiff:
Carol Woods
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wood-Smith et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as 2:2015cv01408
Plaintiff:
Carol Wood-Smith and Eric Wood-Smith
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv00019
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2617 Family and Medical Leave Act Discrimination
AUGUST et al v. MCKESSON CORPORATION et al
as 2:2013cv05826
Plaintiff:
CLARISSA AUGUST , CATHLEEN BAILEY , RICHARD BIRDWELL and others
Defendant:
MCKESSON CORPORATION and SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Woods v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv21713
Plaintiff:
Carol Woods
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. , Sofradim Production SAS and Tissue Science Laboratories Limited
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Woods v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as WVS/2:13-cv-21713
Plaintiff:
Carol Woods
Defendant:
C.R. Bard Inc., Sofradim Production SAS and Tissue Science Laboratories Limited
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
