Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Wallace v. United States of America
as 7:2023cv01090
Plaintiff:
Carol Jean Wallace
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Paskowitz v. Connecticut Water Svc Inc et al
as 3:2018cv01663
Defendant:
Kristen A. Johnson, Mary Ann Hanley, Connecticut Water Svc Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Susan Paskowitz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Assad v. Connecticut Water Svc Inc et al
as 3:2018cv01664
Defendant:
Kristen A. Johnson, Mary Ann Hanley, Connecticut Water Svc Inc and others
Plaintiff:
George Assad
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv03409
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Wallace v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv00767
Plaintiff:
Carol Forrest Wallace
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Carole Wallace, et al v. Barbara Hernandez
as 15-50377
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CAROLE A. WALLACE and DENNIS A. WALLACE, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
BARBARA W. HERNANDEZ
Wallace et al v. Hernandez
as 1:2014cv00691
Defendant:
Barbara W. Hernandez
Plaintiff:
Carole A. Wallace and Dennis A. Wallace, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Richard Swiney v. Ms. Badgett
as 11-6556
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICHARD LEE SWINEY
Defendant - Appellee:
MS. BADGETT
Defendant:
KEITH W. DAVIS, Warden, BURNETTE, Ms.; Grievance Coordinator, GENE JOHNSON, Director Department of Corrections and others
Shawn Valdez v. Carole Wallace
as 10-7349
Petitioner - Appellant:
SHAWN SAMUEL VALDEZ
Respondent - Appellee:
CAROLE F. WALLACE, Warden and KIMBERLY H. RUNION, Warden, Lunenburg Correctional Center
West-Bey v. Wallace et al
as 2:2010cv00121
Plaintiff:
Jerome J. West-Bey
Defendant:
Carol F. Wallace, Mr. Graham and Mr. Chai
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
