Cases 1 - 10 of 11
James v. Jackson et al
as 3:2023cv00127
Plaintiff:
Carolyn James
Defendant:
Schuyler Jackson and Taksal Trans Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00233
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Jones v. Hopkins
as 1:2022cv00788
Plaintiff:
Caren Jones
Defendant:
Carolyn James Hopkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Cambridge Mutual Fire Insurance Company v. 211 North Grove Condominium Association et al
as 1:2021cv02358
Defendant:
Jacques Conway, Carolyn James, Cherina Jones and others
Plaintiff:
Cambridge Mutual Fire Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
James v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 8:2021cv00690
Plaintiff:
Carolyn James
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
JAMES v. SPEEDWAY LLC
as 1:2017cv04261
Plaintiff:
CAROLYN JAMES
Defendant:
SPEEDWAY LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
James et al v. Louisiana Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance Company
as 3:2017cv01323
Plaintiff:
Bradley James and Carolyn James
Defendant:
Louisiana Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4072 Payment of Flood Insurance Claim
James v Calkins
as 4:2016cv01910
Plaintiff:
Carolyn James
Counter_defendant:
Carolyn James
Third_party_defendant:
Phillip Calkins Strauss, Maurice Bresenhan, Jr. , Michael James Wood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James et al v. AbbVie Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv00701
Plaintiff:
Terry James and Ruth Carolyn James
Defendant:
AbbVie Inc. and Abbott Laboratories
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
James v. American Medical Systems, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv24326
Plaintiff:
Carolyn James
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc. , Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
