Cases 1 - 10 of 3,432
Hill v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2024cv00443
Plaintiff:
Cassandra Hill
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 Review of HHS Decision
Smith v. Newsome et al
as 1:2024cv00592
Plaintiff:
Nathanael Lee Smith
Defendant:
Gavin Newsome, Kevin Seibert, Hallie Campbell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Perales v. HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC. d/b/a THE HOME DEPOT
as 6:2024cv00015
Plaintiff:
Cassandra Perales
Defendant:
HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC. d/b/a THE HOME DEPOT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Zimmerman v. Baier et al
as 2:2024cv00551
Plaintiff:
Samuel Zimmerman
Defendant:
Cassandra Baier, Shane Garland, Ellen Baker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Green, Damien v. Baier, Cassandra et al
as 3:2024cv00296
Plaintiff:
Damien Green
Defendant:
Cassandra Baier, Rachel Matushak, Derek Henning and others
Not Yet Classified:
GBCI Prison Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chennells v. Curran et al
as 6:2024cv00615
Plaintiff:
Michael J. Chennells
Defendant:
Michael J. Curran, Edward Haynes, Will Devin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cristo v. DoorDash, Inc.
as 5:2024cv00446
Plaintiff:
Cassandra Cristo
Defendant:
DoorDash, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
Titus Henderson v. Jodie Perttu, et al
as 24-1760
Plaintiff:
TITUS HENDERSON
Defendant:
JODIE PERTTU, ANGELO PANOS, MAKDA FESSAHAYE and others
Titus Henderson v. Rachel Matushak, et al
as 24-1761
Plaintiff:
TITUS HENDERSON
Defendant:
RACHEL MATUSHAK, CASSANDRA BAIR, TONIA ROZMARYNOSKI and others
CAMPEA v. NATIONWIDE MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2024cv01814
Plaintiff:
CASSANDRA CAMPEA
Defendant:
NATIONWIDE MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
