Cases 31 - 40 of 448
John-Cedeno v. The Kings County Hospital
as 1:2022cv07959
Plaintiff:
Karen John-Cedeno
Defendant:
The Kings County Hospital
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Quinones-Cedeno v. Hutchinson et al
as 1:2022cv00364
Plaintiff:
Lazaro Quinones-Cedeno
Defendant:
Ms. J. Hutchinson, P. Torres, C. Weissman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
IBARRA v. D & L PAVING CONTRACTORS, INC. et al
as 2:2022cv06983
Plaintiff:
SIMON CEDENO IBARRA
Defendant:
D & L PAVING CONTRACTORS, INC., J & J PAVING & SEALCOATING CORPORATION, JOSEPH MATARAZZO and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Stawicki v. Wade et al
as 1:2022cv03189
Plaintiff:
Andrew Stawicki and IGGY
Defendant:
Ken Wade, Tim Weed, Trever Rogers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv01659
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Quinones-Cedeno v. Hutchinson et al
as 1:2022cv01834
Plaintiff:
Lazaro Quinones-Cedeno
Defendant:
Ms. J. Hutchinson, P. Torres, C. Weissman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Lazaro Quinones-Cedeno v. J. Ridenour
as 22-7119
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LAZARO QUINONES-CEDENO
Defendant / Appellee:
MS. J. RIDENOUR, Education specialist, M. B. ANTONELLI, FCC Warden, PAUL ADAMS, FCI Warden and others
Cedeno-Colmenares v. Garland
as 22-1578
Petitioner:
JOHAN ALEJENADRO CEDENO-COLMENARES
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
CEDENO v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv11642
Defendant:
3M COMPANY and KRISTIAN MITCHELL CEDENO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Adams et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 2:2022cv04984
Plaintiff:
April Burch, Tarrah Ciarimboli, Alfred Adams and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
