Cases 1 - 10 of 140
United States of America v. Hall
as 23-7373
Defendant / Appellant:
CHADRICK HALL and Sealed Defendant 1
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
CAMPBELL v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv26874
Plaintiff:
CHADRICK CAMPBELL
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
USA v. Chadrick Perry
as 23-1543
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
CHADRICK AKEEM PERRY
US v. Chadrick Fulks
as 23-2
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
CHADRICK EVAN FULKS
Bonner v. Ward et al
as 6:2023cv00014
Plaintiff:
Christopher Dewayne Bonner
Defendant:
Timothy Ward, Trevonza Bobbitt, John and Jane Does and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Custer v. Gable et al
as 1:2023cv01022
Plaintiff:
John Custer
Defendant:
Elizabeth Gable, Maryanne N Ejidike, Kathryn A Craig and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chadrick Fulks v. T. Watson, et al
as 22-3308
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHADRICK FULKS
Defendant / Appellee:
T. J. WATSON, Warden, WILLIAM WILSON, Doctor, LIEUTENANT SHERMAN and others
Interested Party:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Ford v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice, John Montford Unit, et al
as 5:2022cv00317
Plaintiff:
Chadrick Ford
Defendant:
Director, TDCJ-CID, NFN Ivy, Alyssa Milstead and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McGhee v. Louisiana et al
as 1:2022cv05304
Plaintiff:
Chadrick McGhee
Defendant:
State of Louisiana, City of Simmesport, Dale Dupuys and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Homesite Ins. Co. v. Mendenhall
as 2:2022cv00359
Plaintiff:
Homesite Ins. Co.
Defendant:
Chadrick Mendenhall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Injunctive & Declaratory Relief
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
