Cases 11 - 20 of 678
Eason v. City of Senatobia et al
as 3:2024cv00049
Plaintiff:
Latonya Eason
Defendant:
City of Senatobia, Richard Chandler, Zachary Jenkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
GLENN v. CLAYTON et al
as 1:2024cv00081
Plaintiff:
GURLEY E. GLENN
Defendant:
GERALD CLAYTON, DOUGLAS R HARRISON, EDWARD HOUGH WILLAFORD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rodriguez v. Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department
as 2:2024cv00230
Plaintiff:
Danny Alvarez Rodriguez
Defendant:
Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department and Derrick Chandler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00049
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
v. McGee et al
as 0:2024cv00103
Defendant:
Michael McGee, Boyd Beccue, William Chandler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rhodes v. McGee et al
as 0:2024cv00104
Plaintiff:
Thomas Rhodes
Defendant:
Michael McGee, Boyd Beccue, William Chandler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00079
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Boshers v. Maury County Board of Education, et al
as 1:2024cv00001
Plaintiff:
Don H. Boshers
Defendant:
Maury County Board of Education, Lisa A. Ventura and Chandler R. Anderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
(PS) McGee v. State of California et al
as 2:2024cv00012
Plaintiff:
Jefferson A. McGee
Defendant:
State of California, The Governor of California, Arnold Schwarzenegger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2023cv00813
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
