Cases 1 - 10 of 35
SMITH
as 2:2021cv05001
In Re:
CHARLES E. SMITH and CHARLES E. SMITH, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
SMITH v. DAUPHIN COUNTY DOMESTICS
as 2:2021cv00439
Plaintiff:
CHARLES E. SMITH
Defendant:
DAUPHIN COUNTY DOMESTICS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. ALTERNATIVE COUNSELING SERVICES et al
as 2:2021cv00076
Defendant:
CARLOS SAUL, MIKE GREENBURG, ALTERNATIVE COUNSELING SERVICES and others
Plaintiff:
CHARLES E. SMITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 1:2019cv16803
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, STATE OF NEW JERSEY and WARDEN
Petitioner:
CHARLES E. SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Smith et al v. St. Paul Travelers Company, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv01454
Defendant:
Lyons Exit Realty Inc., Counselor Kessel, Nurse Blackmon and others
Plaintiff:
Edmond Hudmond Smith, IV and Louis Holger
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH et al v. SAINT PAUL TRAVELERS COMPANY INC. et al
as 1:2019cv00598
Defendant:
BOB STELLER, MOBILE COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT INC., EDDIE CURRAN and others
Plaintiff:
EDMOND HUDMOND SMITH, IV and LOUIS HOLGER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Smith v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania et al
as 1:2018cv00838
Petitioner:
Charles E. Smith
Respondent:
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Clark and PA Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
HUDSON v. REVELS et al
as 1:2018cv00065
Plaintiff:
JOHN SCOTT HUDSON
Defendant:
WHITNEY DANIELLE REVELS, DEAN LOCKLEAR, RONALD COVINGTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Burdette
as 5:2017cv00496
Plaintiff:
Charles E. Smith
Defendant:
Jeffrey T. Burdette
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania et al
as 1:2017cv02339
Petitioner:
Charles E. Smith
Respondent:
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and PA State Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
