Cases 21 - 30 of 550
Davidson et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2023cv00035
Plaintiff:
Darrell Leon Davidson, David Michael Martin, Larry James Martin and others
Defendant:
3M Company, AGC Chemicals Americas Inc, Amerex Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
USA v. Charles Edwards, Jr.
as 23-5007
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
CHARLES RAY EDWARDS, JR.
Yarbrough v. Lauderdale County Circuit Court
as 3:2022cv00720
Plaintiff:
Charles Ray Yarbrough
Defendant:
Lauderdale County Circuit Court
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
CLEMENT RODRIGUEZ v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv24828
Plaintiff:
CHARLES RAY CLEMENT RODRIGUEZ
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
RAY v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv24626
Plaintiff:
CHARLES RAY
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
HOLDER v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv23370
Plaintiff:
CHARLES RAY HOLDER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv03669
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Augmon v. People of the State of Illinois
as 3:2022cv03216
Plaintiff:
Charles Ray Augmon, III
Defendant:
People of the State of Illinois
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Augmon v. State of West Virginia et al
as 1:2022cv00107
Plaintiff:
Charles Ray Augmon, III
Defendant:
State of West Virginia and A. Cather
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
AUGMON v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
as 2:2022cv01466
Plaintiff:
CHARLES RAY AUGMON, III
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
