Cases 11 - 20 of 30
Lloyd v. Illinois Union Insurance Company et al
as 7:2018cv00387
Defendant:
Charles Watkins, Illinois Union Insurance Company and Charles Watkins an Alabama Citizen doing business as C. Watkins & Associates
Plaintiff:
Harrison Gray Lloyd
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
United States of America v. Busch (Anastasio)
as 18-421
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
Cody Busch, Tony Peebles, AKA Tone, Kyle Eagan, AKA Bow Wow and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Domenico Anastasio, AKA Domo
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2017cv03573
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Watkins et al v. Biomet Orthopedics LLC et al
as 3:2017cv00257
Plaintiff:
Charles Watkins and Amanda Watkins
Defendant:
Biomet Orthopedics LLC , Biomet Inc , Biomet Manufacturing Corp and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
In re: Charles Watkin
as 16-6096
Movant:
In re: CHARLES WATKINS
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Watkins v. Kalamazoo, City of
as 1:2015cv00997
Plaintiff:
Charles Watkins
Defendant:
Kalamazoo, City of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Watkins v. USA
as 1:2015cv00142
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Charles Watkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Owners Insurance Company v. Highridge Poultry, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv00066
Plaintiff:
Owners Insurance Company
Defendant:
Highridge Poultry, Inc., Highridge Poultry, LLC, Charles Watkins and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
TD Bank, N.A. v. Charles Watkins Automobiles, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv00322
Plaintiff:
TD Bank, N.A.
Defendant:
Charles Watkins Automobiles, Inc., Charles T. Watkins and Jackie R. Watkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Watkins v. Merck & Co., Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv03373
Defendant:
Merck & Co., Inc. and Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp.
Plaintiff:
Charles Watkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
