Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv09606
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Brooks v. Mentor Worldwide LLC et al
as 2:2014cv29029
Plaintiff:
Cheryl Brooks
Defendant:
Mentor Worldwide LLC and Coloplast Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Brooke v. United States of America
as 8:2011cv03463
Petitioner:
Cheryl Brooke
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Brooks v. Nationstar Mortgage, LLC
as 1:2011cv01484
Plaintiff:
Cheryl Brooks
Defendant:
Nationstar Mortgage, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444
US v. Cheryl Brooke
as 09-4912
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
CHERYL BROOKE
Movant - None:
TERRY MASSEY, CLARETTA TAYLOR, THURMAN SPEIGHT and others
Merchants Bank v. Bathrick et al
as 0:2008cv06516
Plaintiff:
Merchants Bank and Merchants Bank
Defendant:
Ronald J Bathrick, Brenda K Bathrick, Landis C. Iverson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444 Petition for Removal- Foreclosure
Brooks et al v. SmithKline Beecham Corporation
as 5:2007cv00484
Plaintiff:
Tonya D. Brooks, Tonya D. Brooks, Tonya D. Brooks and others
Defendant:
SmithKline Beecham Corporation and SmithKline Beecham Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Brooks et al v. SmithKline Beecham Corporation
as 1:2007cv00490
Plaintiff:
Tonya D. Brooks, Tonya D. Brooks, Tonya D. Brooks and others
Defendant:
SmithKline Beecham Corporation and SmithKline Beecham Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
BROOKS et al v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
as 2:2007cv00453
Plaintiff:
TONYA D. BROOKS, TONYA D. BROOKS, TONYA D. BROOKS and others
Defendant:
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION and SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
