Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Crowe v. Orem City
as 2:2026cv00004
Plaintiff:
Christopher Crowe
Defendant:
Orem City
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Civil Rights Act
Casarez et al v. 3M Company, f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Co. et al
as 2:2025cv11318
Plaintiff:
Rita Casarez, Martin A Charles, Lynn Chauvin and others
Defendant:
3M Company, f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Co., AGC Chemicals Americas Inc., Amerex Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Feaster v. Crow et al
as 1:2025cv00177
Plaintiff:
Terrance J. Feaster
Defendant:
Christopher Crow, Pack, Durham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crowe et al v. Volvo Car USA, LLC
as 3:2022cv07425
Plaintiff:
Trista Crowe and Christopher Crowe
Defendant:
Car USA, LLC Volvo and Volvo Car USA, LLC
Interested Party:
Volvo Cars of North America, LLC and Volvo Car Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Crowe et al v. Volvo Car USA, LLC
as 3:2022cv06957
Plaintiff:
Trista Crowe and Christopher Crowe
Defendant:
Volvo Car USA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Adkins et al v. Flash Market LLC et al
as 4:2022cv00858
Plaintiff:
Khurshonda Adkins, Elizabeth Alvarez, Jalyn Anthony and others
Defendant:
Flash Market LLC and PFMFC Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
CROW v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv23108
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER CROW
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CROWE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv88998
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER CROWE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
In re: Christopher Crow
as 18-12125
Petitioner:
In re: CHRISTOPHER CROW
Mandamus Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.