Cases 11 - 20 of 21
Maxwell v. Almanza et al
as 1:2018cv00179
Defendant:
Christopher Schmidt, John Doe #1, Steven A Sperry and others
Plaintiff:
Marcus Maxwell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Schmidt v. Pearl Welding & Repair, Inc.
as 3:2018cv00268
Plaintiff:
Christopher Schmidt
Defendant:
Pearl Welding & Repair, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
SCHMIDT v. AGENCY INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2017cv04813
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER SCHMIDT and MARLENE SCHMIDT
Defendant:
AGENCY INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Joseph Nyilas, et al v. James Steinaway, et al
as 16-1829
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSEPH NYILAS, IRENE NYILAS and ROBERT NYILAS
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES STEINAWAY, CHRISTOPHER SCHMIDT, ANTHONY CLAYTON and others
Lacy v. Lewis et al
as 1:2015cv06129
Plaintiff:
Liddell Lacy
Defendant:
Ronnie Lewis, Kenmond Eng, Lawrence Wallace and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roberts v. Kurtz et al
as 3:2015cv00579
Plaintiff:
Steven Roberts
Defendant:
Stewart Kurtz, Christopher Schmidt and Attorney General of PA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nyilas et al v. Steinaway et al
as 2:2014cv13122
Plaintiff:
Joseph Nyilas , Irene Nyilas and Robert Nyilas
Defendant:
James Steinaway, Christopher Schmidt, Anthony Clayton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. James et al
as 4:2014cv02763
Plaintiff:
Wendy Jones
Defendant:
Jeremy James, Kim Crow, Tracy Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Schmidt et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv08380
Plaintiff:
Kathleen Schmidt and Christopher Schmidt
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JEWELRY INSURANCE BROKERAGE OF NORTH AMERICA v. SCHMIDT
as 1:2010cv00642
Plaintiff:
JEWELRY INSURANCE BROKERAGE OF NORTH AMERICA
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER SCHMIDT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
