Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Dawson et al v. Porch.com Inc et al
as 3:2024cv07974
Plaintiff:
Mark Anderson, Leo Anderson, Robert Allen and others
Defendant:
Matthew Ehrlichman, Porch.com Inc and GoSmith Inc
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Brookman v. Reed-Custer Community School District 255 et al
as 1:2018cv07836
Plaintiff:
Richard and Allison Brookman, Richard Brookman and Allison Brookman
Defendant:
Mark Wolf, Michael Smith, Reed-Custer Community School District 255 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Schaeffer v. Anderson et al
as 1:2017cv02447
Plaintiff:
Gary Schaeffer
Defendant:
Chuck Anderson, Hearst Communications, Inc. and Campbell-Ewald Company
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
Houston v. Jarvis et al
as 1:2014cv00070
Plaintiff:
Eric Houston
Defendant:
James H. Jarvis, McNutt, Jeff Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00470
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anderson et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as 2:2013cv10339
Plaintiff:
Tracee Anderson and Chuck Anderson
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 13-1351
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv00609
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0794
Terrell v. Benfer, et al
as 10-3470
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BROOKS TERRELL
Defendant - Appellee:
BENFER, FLEMMINS and CHUCK ANDERSON
Louis Perry v. Car Credit City, et al
as 09-8014
Respondent:
Louis Perry, Class Representative
:
Weinberg Motors, Inc., formerly known as Weinberg Dodge, Inc., Lovergreen Ford Mercury, Ken Behlman Automotive Services, Inc. and others
Petitioner:
Car Credit City, LLC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
