Cases 11 - 20 of 695
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00796
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Clemens v. Kids Above All
as 1:2024cv01302
Plaintiff:
Georgette Clemons and Georgette Clemens
Defendant:
Kids Above All, Virginia Towner, Precious Morris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00142
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Koot v. BWDAC, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00190
Plaintiff:
Clemens A Koot
Defendant:
BWDAC, Inc., Pneumo Abex LLC, DCO, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Benoir et al v. Town of Parksley, Virginia et al
as 2:2024cv00064
Plaintiff:
Theslet Benoir, Clemene Bastien and Eben-Ezer Haitian Food Truck LLC
Defendant:
Town of Parksley, Virginia and Henry Nicholson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mason v. James Allred
as 7:2024cv00005
Petitioner:
Deondray Raymond Mason
Defendant:
Preston Smith, Bill Clements, FNU Clemens and others
Respondent:
James Allred and Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Owens v. Dixon et al
as 3:2024cv00060
Plaintiff:
Albert T. Owens, Jr.
Defendant:
Ricky Dixon, R. Polk, Barns and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00074
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Urve Maggitti v. William Mahon, et al
as 23-3275
Plaintiff:
URVE MAGGITTI
Defendant:
WILLIAM P. MAHON, JOHN HALL, DEBRA TODD and others
Clemens v. FCI Butner - 2
as 5:2023ct03360
Plaintiff:
Charles Clemens
Defendant:
FCI Butner - 2, L.B. Kelly, Ms. Watkins and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
