Cases 1 - 10 of 773
Baksh v. Livingston County Community Mental Health et al
as 2:2024cv10995
Plaintiff:
Christian Baksh
Defendant:
Livingston County Community Mental Health, Connie Conklin and John Does 1-x
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00193
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Conklin v. State Farm Lloyds
as 4:2024cv00246
Plaintiff:
Mike Conklin
Defendant:
State Farm Lloyds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Vaughn et al v. County of Washington et al
as 1:2024cv00327
Plaintiff:
Michael Vaughn, Kevin Green, Deborah Patterson and others
Defendant:
County of Washington and Al Nolette
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00857
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Givens v. Palagummi, et al.
as 24-1012
Plaintiff:
FRANCOIS POITIER GIVENS
Defendant:
SAMBRAJYA PALAGUMMI, Doctor, C. CONKLIN and ROBERT CHAPNICK, M.D., Chief Medical Executive
Conklin IV v. Doe et al
as 3:2024cv00189
Plaintiff:
Donald R. Conklin IV
Defendant:
John Doe and Carbon County Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bertha v. Kane County et al
as 1:2024cv00377
Plaintiff:
David A Bertha
Defendant:
Kane County, DeKalb County, Lake County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Conklin IV v. Youngkin
as 3:2024cv00029
Plaintiff:
Donald R. Conklin IV
Defendant:
James Youngkin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sitts et al v. County of Saratoga et al
as 1:2023cv01649
Plaintiff:
Lisa Santore, Roger Sitts, Wayne Roberts and others
Defendant:
County of Saratoga and Andrew Jarosh
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
