Cases 1 - 10 of 809
Conklin v. Oregon Medical Board et al
as 3:2025cv01173
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Conklin
Defendant:
Oregon Medical Board, Nicole Krishnaswami, Michael Seidel and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Cox v. Diamond Head Apartments, Ltd. et al
as 1:2025cv00253
Defendant:
Rosalia Liliana Bosch, Diamond Head Apartments, Ltd., David L. Mulliken and others
Plaintiff:
Joe B. Cox
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Conklin v. Ford Motor Company et al
as 3:2025cv01541
Plaintiff:
Gary Conklin
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company and Does 1 through 10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Conklin v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2025cv11522
Plaintiff:
Barbara Ann Conklin
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Conklin v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2025cv00438
Plaintiff:
Colleen Conklin
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Conklin v. Social Security Administration
as 3:2025cv05037
Plaintiff:
Ted W Conklin
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 25-1905
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Heimlick v. Newman
as 25-20152
Plaintiff:
Edmund Heimlick
Defendant:
Michael Newman, in Official Capacity as Judge and Individual Capacity and as Attorney, Jerry Simoneaux, in Official Capacity as Judge and Individual Capacity and as Attorney, David S. Cook, as Personal Representative of The Estate and others
Barnes v. Annucci
as 25-921
Defendant:
B. FLEURY, DONALD G. UHLER, Superintendent of Upstate Correctional Facility, PAUL P. WOODRUFF, Deputy Superintendent of Security Upstate Correctional Facility and others
Plaintiff:
JESSIE J. BARNES
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
