Cases 71 - 80 of 635
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00006
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Amicus Curiae:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
JOHNSON v. DAEMER et al
as 2:2022cv00310
Plaintiff:
ROBERT W JOHNSON
Defendant:
DEVON DAEMER, ACE CHUBB, DREAM HOTEL GROUP, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CRAWLEY v. ARMEL et al
as 2:2022cv00106
Petitioner:
JESSIE CRAWLEY
Respondent:
ERIC ARMEL, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF ALLEGHENY COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
CRAWLEY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv00683
Plaintiff:
RYAN MANCE CRAWLEY
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00001
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Crawley v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv05643
Plaintiff:
Cheryl Crawley
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Crawley v. Atrium Medical Corporation et al
as 1:2021cv01033
Plaintiff:
Cheryl Crawley, Atrium Medical Corporation and Maquet Cardiovascular US Sales, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CRAWLEY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2021cv02154
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER CRAWLEY
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Crawley v. Duke Energy Corporation Short Term Disability Plan
as 4:2021cv03467
Plaintiff:
Martin L Crawley
Defendant:
Duke Energy Corporation Short Term Disability Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Berlik et al v. Baker et al
as 1:2021cv11723
Plaintiff:
Sacha Berlik, Berit Block, Paul Dean and others
Defendant:
Michael Baker, Edward Crawley, Jeffrey Bussgang and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
