Cases 11 - 20 of 20
CHAPMAN v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON, INC et al
as 3:2021cv01084
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, INC and JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC
Plaintiff:
CRYSTAL CHAPMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Chapman v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv00441
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Crystal Chapman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Chapman v. DSC Logistics, LLC et al
as 1:2020cv02122
Plaintiff:
Crystal Chapman
Defendant:
DSC Logistics, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chapman v. Abbott Laboratories, Inc.
as 3:2018cv00429
Plaintiff:
Crystal Chapman
Defendant:
Abbott Laboratories, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Chapman et al v. Forrest et al
as 6:2017cv00352
Defendant:
Scott Victor Forrest and Tennessee Steel Haulers, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Shannon Chapman and Crystal Chapman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Felder v. South Carolina et al
as 5:2016cv02788
Plaintiff:
Stanley Felder
Defendant:
South Carolina, Orangeburg County Solicitor's Office, Carol J Frick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chapman v. City of Rochester et al
as 6:2015cv06049
Plaintiff:
Crystal Chapman
Defendant:
City of Rochester , Eliud Rodriguez , Michael Perkowski and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Chapman et al v Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2013cv07150
Plaintiff:
Crystal Chapman and Israel Chapman
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv01025
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Chapman v. Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
as 1:2010cv03052
Plaintiff:
Crystal Chapman
Defendant:
Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
