Cases 11 - 20 of 2,698
Curry v. Hughes et al
as 1:2024cv01121
Plaintiff:
Steven Curry
Defendant:
Latoya Hughes, Mindi Nurse, . Meyers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilson v. USA
as 3:2024cv00310
Petitioner:
Shaneeka Curry Wilson
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Curry v. Wingfield et al
as 3:2024cv00141
Plaintiff:
Freddie Lee Curry
Defendant:
B. Wingfield, Federal Bureau of Prisons and United States Attorney General
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Lawrence v. Currie et al
as 0:2024cv01131
Plaintiff:
Johnny Lawrence
Defendant:
Judge C.M. Currie, John Doe Prison Guard, Jane Doe Prison Guard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Curry v. Warden Carlton
as 8:2024cv00528
Petitioner:
Jeriton Lavar Curry
Respondent:
Warden Carlton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Norred v. TDCJ-CID Byrd Unit et al
as 4:2024cv00630
Plaintiff:
Carl Lee Norred
Defendant:
TDCJ-CID Byrd Unit, UTMB Correctional Division, Dr. Curry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TANNER v. FRENCH et al
as 3:2024cv00078
Plaintiff:
ALPHONSO TARODD TANNER
Defendant:
FRENCH, DIRECTOR CURRY, SKKRUBS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Curry v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv08002
Petitioner:
Ameche Lashuan Curry
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Curry v. Akers
as 6:2024cv00021
Petitioner:
Robert Curry
Respondent:
Daniel Akers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Woods v. Doe
as 2:2024cv00026
Plaintiff:
Demetrius Woods and Demetrius L Woods
Defendant:
Doe, Gary Musslelwhite, Pierce and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
