Cases 1 - 10 of 33
Barefield v. Killian et al
as 6:2023cv06108
Plaintiff:
Keya Deonte Barefield
Defendant:
Sgt Nicholas Killian, Sgt Jawaun Lee, Lt. Jordan Montgomery and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barefield v. Rondoni et al
as 6:2023cv06094
Plaintiff:
Keya Deonte Barefield
Defendant:
Sgt. Oscar Rondoni, Program Warden Tasha Griffin, Deputy Warden Randy Straughn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Richardson v. Lall et al
as 1:2022cv01831
Plaintiff:
Raymond Remell Richardson, Jr.
Defendant:
Judge J. Jessy Lall, Sergeant Francious, M.P. Officer Strout and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Martinez v. Angeline Cafe, LTD. et al
as 1:2022cv00180
Plaintiff:
Antonio Martinez
Defendant:
Angeline Cafe, LTD. and Curtis Clarke
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Clark v. Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2020cv09404
Defendant:
Department of Corrections, Marget Egan, Cynthia Brann and others
Plaintiff:
Curtis Clark
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CLARK v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv67558
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
CURTIS CLARK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CLARK v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv36243
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
CURTIS CLARK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gause et al v. United States of America
as 8:2020cv00458
Plaintiff:
Yolanda Gause and Curtis Clark
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Clark v. Hall
as 2:2019cv00049
Defendant:
Pelicia E. Hall
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
James Curtis Clark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Clark v. USA
as 1:2018cv00135
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Joshua Curtis Clark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
