Cases 11 - 20 of 61
Harris v. BP Exploration & Production, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv00483
Plaintiff:
Curtis Harris
Defendant:
BP America Production Company and BP Exploration & Production, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Abdullah v. City of Niagara Falls
as 21-285
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Marcus Caldwell, Michael D. Nalls, Catrice Byrd-Pippens and others
Defendant / Appellant:
City of Niagara Falls, Conestoga-Rovers & Associates, Occidental Chemical Corporation, Individually and as Successor in Interest to Hooker Chemicals and Plastics Corporation and others
Harris v. Marshall et al (MAG+)
as 2:2020cv01016
Defendant:
Steven T. Marshall, A. Simmons, Yolanda Stokes and others
Plaintiff:
Joe Curtis Harris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HARRIS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv66863
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
CURTIS HARRIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Abdullah et al v. City of Niagara Falls et al
as 1:2020cv00145
Plaintiff:
Estilleta C. Burch, Debra Crowell, Jillian Carol Horner and others
Defendant:
Occidental Chemical Corporation, Miller Springs Remediation Management, Inc., Glenn Springs Holdings, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Harris v. Grady County Law Enforcement Center
as 5:2019cv00761
Defendant:
Grady County Law Enforcement Center
Plaintiff:
Joe Curtis Harris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris Bey v. Hissong et al
as 2:2019cv11556
Defendant:
Randle, Harpst, G Hissong and others
Plaintiff:
Curtis Harris Bey
Harris v. Darius
as 2:2019cv00171
Defendant:
Jim Darius
Plaintiff:
Joe Curtis Harris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris v. United States of America et al
as 5:2019hc02083
Petitioner:
Joe Curtis Harris
Respondent:
United States of America and U.S.M.S.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Harris v. Darius
as 5:2019ct03058
Defendant:
Jim Darius
Plaintiff:
Joe Curtis Harris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
