Cases 1 - 10 of 28
YOUNG v. ELI LILLY AND COMPANY
as 2:2024cv03997
Defendant:
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY
Plaintiff:
CYNTHIA YOUNG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
YOUNG v. ELI LILLY AND COMPANY
as PAE/2:24-cv-03997
Defendant:
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY
Plaintiff:
CYNTHIA YOUNG
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01121
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
US v. Cynthia Gilmore
as 22-6828
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
CYNTHIA GILMORE, a/k/a Lady Bynt, a/k/a Cynthia Young
YOUNG v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON, INC et al
as 3:2020cv20727
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC and JOHNSON & JOHNSON, INC
Plaintiff:
CYNTHIA YOUNG and CYNTHIA A. YOUNG
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Young et al v. Monsanto Company
as 3:2020cv00518
Plaintiff:
Anthony Young and Cynthia Young
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Young et al v. Monsanto Company
as 4:2019cv03368
Plaintiff:
Anthony Young and Cynthia Young
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lewis v. United States Department of Justice et al
as 1:2019cv10821
Defendant:
Consolidated Legal Center, Cynthia Young, US Attorney General William Barr and others
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Wayne Lewis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dana Van Leuven et al v. Ford Motor Company et al
as 2:2018cv04322
Plaintiff:
Dana Van Leuven and Cynthia Young
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company and Fiesta Ford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal -- Other Contract
Dana Van Leuven et al v. Ford Motor Company et al
as CAC/2:18-CV-04322
Plaintiff:
Dana Van Leuven and Cynthia Young
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company and Fiesta Ford
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
