Cases 1 - 10 of 100
CANTARA et al v. CYR et al
as 1:2026cv00722
Plaintiff:
DAVID CANTARA and PAMELA CANTARA
Defendant:
CY CYR, ROBIN CYR and BARK & FLY RANCH LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Mody et al v. Diez-Canseco et al
as 1:2026cv01860
Plaintiff:
Chirag Mody
Defendant:
Russell Diez-Canseco, Glenda Flanagan, Kofi Amoo-Gottfried and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
BARTLEY et al v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2026vv00798
Petitioner:
MONICA BARTLEY and ANDREA CYR
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
Cyr et al v. GOOGLE LLC
as 4:2026cv03710
Plaintiff:
James Cyr
Defendant:
GOOGLE LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Cyr et al v. Porsche Cars North America, Inc.
as 3:2026cv02638
Plaintiff:
Sylvain P. Cyr and Jessie Farah M. Fecteau
Defendant:
Porsche Cars North America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 231
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv00628
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Conwell v. County of Cook, Illinois et al
as 1:2026cv03629
Plaintiff:
Donald Conwell
Defendant:
County of Cook, Illinois, Thomas Dart, Cermak Health Service and others
:
Service List
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pauker v. Heart Consciousness Church, Inc., et al.
as 26-1264
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL PAUKER
Defendant:
HEART CONSCIOUSNESS CHURCH, INC. and DEREK CYR
Yeboah v. State of Connecticut et al
as 3:2026cv00317
Plaintiff:
Cheryl L. Yeboah and Kwadwo A. Yeboah
Defendant:
State of Connecticut, Superior Court Housing Session, Cristina Lopez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Housing Discrimination
Robert Cyr v. Secretary Department of Corrections
as 26-10392
Petitioner:
ROBERT CYR
Respondent:
SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
